Monday, April 18, 2005

Women leaders need to strike right balance

DUBAI - Education undoubtedly plays a key role in developing women leaders globally, but to excel in the local UAE market, women leaders must also maintain a balance between careers and family and respect business ethics, voiced prominent national and exaptraite women participating in the 'Women, Education and Achievement' seminar hosted in Dubai on Sunday.
It is an empirical question whether "to excel" at work "women leaders must also maintain a balance between careers and family." There may be some complementarities between career and family and these should reveal themselves in the data. For now, though, I remain inclined to believe that firms know what is in their best interest, and what firms appear to believe is that family demands on an employee's time take away from productivity at work.

The seminar organised by the Australian Embassy in cooperation with Sultan Al Owais Cultural Foundation featured two Australian senior visiting academics, Professor Helen Grant, Vice-Chancellor, Charles Darwin University, Wendy McCarthy, Chancellor of University of Canberra, and two prominent UAE women leaders - Dr Fatima Al Sayegh, Lecturer in history, UAE University, and Latifa Fikri, Sales and Business Development Manager, Etisalat, Dubai.
It is interesting what the article does not say. It does not say that conferees said business should be more open to hiring women despite business perceptions that women have competing family pressures that men are likely avoiding. (Such as childbearing, childrearing, caring for aging parents, and housework. There is substantial empirical evidence that women, even if they work, do more of these things than men do. And feminist groups cite this evidence with regularity.)

Perhaps this value judgment - that businesses should treat men and women equally - went unstated (if it did) because these four women realize that they each work for businesses which are protected by the government. Businesses that are not protected from competition will be driven out of business if they act contrary to profit maximizing behavior.

If government places a value on women participating in the labor market, then government needs to do more than require business to do so. Government will need to subsidize female employment. Unless of course females and males are perfect substitutes in production. However, in this case the firms will voluntarily treat them equally. Unless of course the firms are ignorant of what is good for them. Perhaps, then, the burden on government is to disabuse firms of their ignorance by providing them with that evidence.

2 Comments:

Blogger secretdubai said...

In terms of childrearing, they have it a lot easier than their western sisters. Because many marry young and have children young (18/19 is still common), and have a lot of family support, they stay on at university even after having a couple of babies, and then start work, without the need for maternity leave.

Also because of third world labour availability, it is cost-effective to work and pay for full-time childcare, whereas in most low-to-medium pay jobs in the west, it is not.

10:08 PM  
Blogger John B. Chilton said...

What secretdubai comments is true and the effect can be substantial. The downside for the culture is that the new generation is being raised by women who know nothing of the culture and who the children often are not taught to respect.

Should this result in a backlash against women working the irony is that greater proportion of children whose parents are playing a reduced rearing role are not working. Cheap labor makes it feasible, if not wise, to spend more time outside the home.

12:54 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home